CannabIP: U.S. Patent No. PP30,434 P3
U.S. Patent No. PP30,434 P3 (‘434) issued on April 23, 2019, for “Cannabis Plant Named ‘LW-BB1’.” It was issued to inventors Andrew Alfred, Ian Dumpert, and Christopher Chapdeline of Denver,...
U.S. Patent No. PP30,434 P3 (‘434) issued on April 23, 2019, for “Cannabis Plant Named ‘LW-BB1’.” It was issued to inventors Andrew Alfred, Ian Dumpert, and Christopher Chapdeline of Denver,...
Source: U.S. Patent No. 5,859,601, Jan. 12, 1999, to Jaekyun Moon & Barrett J. Brickner (inventors); Regents of the University of Minnesota (assignee) On June 14, 2019, the Court of Appeals for the...
U.S. Patent No. 10,265,362 B2 (‘362) issued on April 23, 2019, for “Ingestible Films Having Substances From Hemp or Cannabis.” It was issued to applicant/inventor Scott Schaneville, of St....
U.S. Patent No. 10,239,808 B1 (‘808) issued on March 26, 2019, for “Cannabis Extracts.” It was issued to inventors Jacob Black of New Haven, Connecticut, Ryan Beigle of Littleton, Colorado, and Alex...
On May 30, 2019, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Washington v. Barr, refused to dismiss outright a case where the plaintiffs alleged marijuana’s classification on the Drug Enforcement...
On June 10, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, in which the Court held that the Government was...
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, C23H34N5O14P The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has recently opened an investigation into possible violations of Gilead Sciences, Inc.’s exclusive license with the...
U.S. Patent No. 10,179,694 B2 (‘694) issued on November 20, 2018, for “Constant Illuminated Tamper-Resistant Plant Shipping Container.” It was issued to applicant/inventor Larry D. Fenner, Jr. of...
U.S. Patent No. D844,022 S (‘022) issued on March 26, 2019, for “Computing Device Display Screen with Graphical User Interface.” It was issued to inventor Shalin Amin, of San Francisco, California....
What had opened with a promise of clarity for patent subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. §101 took a detour with the ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc., decision issued on March 28 2019,...