On March 20, 2019, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in SRI Int’l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., in which claims directed to network intrusion were found patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C....
U.S. Patent No. 10,172,786 B2 (‘786) issued on January 8, 2019, for “Oral Care Composition Comprising Cannabinoids.” It was issued to applicant Axim Biotechnologies, Inc., of New York, New York....
U.S. Patent No. 10,132,564 B1 (‘564) issued on November 20, 2018, for “Plant Dryer with Improved Convection Flow.” It was issued to applicant/inventor Harvey Romanek of Seminole, Florida. The...
U.S. Patent No. PP30,173 P2 (‘173) issued on February 5, 2019, for “Grandiflora Rose Plant Named ‘KORmonali’.” It was issued to inventor Wilhelm-Alexander Kordes of Klein Offenseth-Sparrieshoop,...
U.S. Patent No. 10,154,254 B2 (‘254), issued on December 11, 2018, for “Time-of-Flight Depth Sensing for Eye Tracking.” The inventor is Nicholas Daniel Trail of Bothell, Washington. The applicant...
U.S. Patent No. 10,144,342 B2 (‘342), issued on December 4, 2018, for “Mobile Robot.” The inventors are Ze Ji of Portsmouth, Great Britain, and Christopher Andrew Smith of Bristol, Great Britain....
U.S. Patent No. 10,155,018 B1 (‘018) issued on December 18, 2018, for “Method of Improving Sexual Response and Sensitivity.” It was issued to applicant/inventor Dennis M. Jenn of South Jordan, Utah....
In its second patent-eligibility ruling in a few weeks, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Natural Alts. Int’l, Inc. v. Creative Compounds, LLC, on March 15, 2019, in which it found...
U.S. Patent No. D835,564 S (‘564) issued on December 11, 2018, for “Wiper.” It was issued to inventors Franz Von Holzhausen of Malibu, California, David Tadashi Imai of Los Angeles, California,...
Sometimes substantive patent issues are never dealt with in cases, but rather dispositive issues are handled by procedural mechanisms. One case in point is Momenta Pharms., Inc. v. Bristol-Myers...